Analysis of Criminal Acts Without Rights or Against the Law to Commit Conspiracy in Buying, Receiving, Being an Intermediary in the Sale and Purchase of Narcotics in Decision No. 315/Pid.Sus / 2025 / PN Sbw

Rilawadi Sahputra

doi:10.59712/iaml.v5i1.156

Authors

Rilawadi Sahputra Universitas Dharmawangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v5i1.156

Keywords:

Conspiracy, Middlemen, Narcotics

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of elements of criminal acts without rights or against the law in conspiracy to buy, receive, and become an intermediary for the sale and purchase of narcotics based on Decision number 315/Pid.Sus / 2025 / PN Sbw. The research method uses normative juridical approach with statute approach and case approach analysis technique to court decision. The results showed that the panel of judges proved all elements of Article 114 paragraph (2) jo. Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics systematically, includes elements of "every person", "conspiracy", "without rights or against the law", and "being an intermediary in the sale and purchase of narcotics class I non-plant weighing more than 5 grams". Evidence of conspiracy was made through a structured agreement between Ken, defendant I as a broker, and defendant II as a courier in distributing 36.47 grams of methamphetamine. The panel of judges applied the principle of lex favor reo by implementing Law Number 1 of 2026 concerning criminal adjustments that remove special minimum crimes, thus imposing a prison sentence of 7 years for Defendant I and 5 years for Defendant II without a fine. The conclusion of the study confirms that the proof of conspiracy does not require the implementation of a criminal act perfectly, but enough with the agreement and preparation that leads to the implementation of narcotics crimes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Maswandi, A. S. (2024). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Mekanisme Dalam Penulisan Ilmiah), Mazda Media, Malang.

Ariman Sitompul, (2023). Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Serta Penanggulangan Kejahatan di Indonesia.

Adyo, Refania Rahmitha. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Penjara Di Bawah Minimum Khusus Dalam Perkara Narkotika (Studi Putusan Nomor 60/Pid.Sus/2022/PN. Tlk Jo. Putusan Nomor 564/Pid.Sus/2022/PT. PBR Jo. Putusan Nomor 476 K/Pid.Sus/2023),” 2023, 1–16.

Ayu, Dewa, Risma Pranasita, I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, and Kade Richa Mulyawati. “Modus Operandi Penyelundupan Narkoba Sindikat Kejahatan Transnasional Terorganisasi Dalam Perspektif Kriminologi ( Studi Kasus Di Polda Bali )” 5, no. 3 (2023): 269–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.5.3.2023.269-275

Erixon, Isak, and Ali Johardi Wirogioto. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tanpa Hak Dan Melawan Hukum Melakukan Pemufakatan Jahat Menerima Dan Mengirimkan Narkotika Golongan I” 9, no. 1 (2025): 97–109.

Noor, Ananda, and Eliza Rachmawati. “Kejahatan Transnasional Permufakatan Jahat Dalam Tindak Pidana Jual Beli Narkotika Golongan I” 13, no. 2 (2023): 152–62. https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v12i2.70645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v12i2.70645

Pamungkas, Teguh Karya. “Analisis Putusan Nomor 70/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Jmr: Permufakatan Jahat Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika” 4 (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.56013/welfarestate.v4i2.3669

Pardede, Rendra Yoki. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Di Bawah Ancaman Pidana Minimum Khusus Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 775K/Pid.Sus/2020)” 2, no. 35 (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v2i3.31

Prawesthi, Wahyu, and Bahrul Amiq. “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Permufakatan Jahat Jual Beli Narkotika Di Wilayah Hukum Badan Reserse Kriminal Polri Direktorat Tindak Pidana Narkoba Jakarta” 6, no. 1 (2025): 69–84.

Putra, Doni Eka. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Permufakatan Jahat Menjadi Perantara Narkotika Dalam Putusan Nomor 295/Pid.Sus/2025/Pt Pdg” 3, no. 1 (2025): 37–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59963/jglegar.v3i1.430

“Putusan Nomor 315/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Sbw,” 2025.

Setiawan, Yani. “Transformasi Digital Kejahatan Narkotika: Analisis Kriminologis Dan Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Era Cyber Narcotic,” 2025, 38–55.

Siregar, Sholihuddin Alfauji. “Analisis Kriminologi Terhadap Anggota Kepolisian Pelaku Pencucian Uang Yang Berasal Dari Kejahatan Narkotika” 1 (2021): 1–13.

Syahruddin. “Legal Analysis of Criminal Conspiracy in Class I Narcotics Crimes Not Plants and the Imposition of Criminal Sentences by Judges Study of Decision Number 23/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Ban” 4, no. 4 (2025): 4364–73.

Sitompul, M. N., & Sitompul, A. (2022). Execution of death penalty in narcotics crime in the perspective of national law in Indonesia. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 1(2), 107-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v1i2.19

Sitompul, A. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Strategi Praktis Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi).

Sitompul, A. (2023). Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Serta Penanggulangan Kejahatan di Indonesia.

Tahir, Muhammad Rachmad. “Analysis Of Gorontalo District Court Decision Number 209/Pid.Sus/2021 Relates To Narcotics Crimes Committed With Malicious Consensus” 9, no. 2 (2023): 109–19

Wahyuni, Yelli Sri. “Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Pemufakatan Jahat Dalam Melakukan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Oleh Anak” VII, no. 2 (2023): 310–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v7i2.926

Yusuf, Hudi. “Kajian Hukum Terhadap Anak Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dalam Perspektif Kriminologi Legal Study of Children Who Commit Narcotics Crimes from a Criminological Perspective,” 2024, 1990–2001.