Gratification development in corruption in Indonesia

arimansitompul arimansitompul

doi:10.59712/iaml.v3i1.77

Authors

arimansitompul arimansitompul undhar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i1.77

Keywords:

Gratification, Corruption, Indonesia

Abstract

The background of this article is the number of cases of gratuities received by state administrators / officials that cause corruption bribery. The purpose of this article is to find out the general overview and regulation of gratuities and analysis of gratitude that can be a corruption of gratuities. In this writing, normative legal methods are used, the solution of which is based on literature and legislation. The conclusion in this writing is that gratification can be classified as bribery corruption and a sign of gratitude that can be a gratuitous type of corruption. Acceptance of such gratuities is contrary to its obligations. In order for the gratuity not to be considered a corruption offense of bribery, the recipient must submit a report to the Corruption Eradication Commission, no later than 30 days after receiving the gratuity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Akbar, S. (2016). Gratifikasi seksual sebagai bentuk tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 4(3), 485-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v4i3.378

Ariman Sitompul (2020). E-Procurement System in the Mechanism of Procueremen of Goofs and Service Electronically. International Asia of Law and Money Laundering, 1(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v1i1.11

Ariman Sitompul, P Hasibuan, M Sahnan. (2021). The Morality Of Law Enforcement Agencies (Police, Prosecutor's Office, KPK) In Money Laundering With The Origin Of The Corruption. European Science Review 9 (10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29013/ESR-21-9.10-55-63

Ariman Sitompul, Sabela Gayo. (2022). The Use of Mediation as an Alternative Health Dispute Resolution. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences

Ariman Sitompul. (2023). Alternative Dispute Resolution Criminal Acts Of Money Politics In Elections In View Of Normative Law. International Asia Of Law And Money Laundering (Iaml), 2(1), 1–9. Https://Doi.Org/10.59712/Iaml.V2i1.52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v2i1.52

Ariman Sitompul. (2023). Eradication Of Corruption By Tracing Money Laundering As An Integral Legal System That Can Not Be Separated. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 2(3), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v2i3.66 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v2i3.66

Audy, V., & Firmansyah, H. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Pemberian Hibah Kepada Pejabat Ditinjau Dari Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 4604-4614. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1296

Aziza, Sofi Nur. 2022. “Pentingnya Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Terhadap Mahasiswa.” JUSTICES: Journal of Law 1(1):46–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v1i1.5

Baidi, Ribut. 2019. “Peluang Dan Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Hukum Pidana Dan Pembangunan Hukum 1(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25105/hpph.v1i2.5464

Barda Nawawi Arief , Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, (Bandung : PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003).

Bethesda, E. (2019). Masyarakat Memandang Gratifikasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 5(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v5i2.18311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v5i2.18311

Christianto, Hwian. 2020. “From Crime Control Model to Due Process Model: A Critical Study of Wiretapping Arrangement by the Corruption Eradication Commission of Indonesia.” PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) 7(3):421–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v7n3.a7

Ewaprilyandi Fahmi Saputra, Hery Firmansyah, Politik Hukum dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi melalui Pembaharuan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagai Extraordinary Crime dalam KUHP Nasional , UNES Law Review: Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)

Ince, Fatma. 2023. “Strategies to Combat Hidden Resignation and Disguised Unemployment.” Pp. 258–73 in Management Strategies and Tools for Addressing Corruption in Public and Private Organizations. IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8536-1.ch014

Indah Ayu Lestari, S., & Haryono. (2022). Tindak Korupsi : Budaya Praktik Gratifikasi Dalam Pelayanan Administratif Masyarakat (Analisis Sosiologi Korupsi). Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online), 3(2), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.36312/jcm.v3i2.668

Marbela, S., Aprilya, Z., & Ulfa, K. (2023). Pentingnya Prinsip Etika Administrasi Publik Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Gratifikasi Di Lingkungan Birokrasi Publik. SANGER Journal, 1(1), 28-42. Retrieved from http://journal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/sanger/article/view/2956

Mhd. Nasir Sitompul, Ariman Sitompul . (2023). Application of money laundering in corruption cases in maintaining state stability. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i1.121

Putri, A. B., & Saragih, R. (2023). Komunikasi Budaya Salam Tempel Di Indonesia Sebagai Bentuk Gratifikasi Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Kompetensi, 16(2), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.36277/kompetensi.v16i2.191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36277/kompetensi.v16i2.191

Razak, A., Sunggara, R., & Thalib, H. (2023). Pengaturan Gratifikasi Sebagai Salah Satu Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Undang-Undang Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Journal of Lex Theory (JLT), 4(1), 164-180. https://doi.org/10.52103/jlt.v4i1.1537

Rina Melati Sitompul, and Andi Maysarah. “Ultimum Remedium Principles In Criminal Decisions In Creating Restorative Justice.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 7, No. 1 (2021): 32–46. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v7i1.324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v7i1.324

Setiasih, R. (2021). Beban Pembuktian Bagi Pegawai Negeri Sipil dan Pejabat Negara Di Indonesia Atas Pemberian Gratifikasi. Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Dan Pendidikan, 7(1), 1-8.

Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakkan Hukum, CV Rajawali, Jakarta, 1983.

Sukmadi, Sukmadi. 2022. “The Pentahelix Model in Synergizing Sectors Tourism in West Java to Improve Local Economy.” International Journal of Social Science 2(4):1873–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v2i4.4165

Sumaryanto, D. (2019). Harmonisasi Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 28(2), 108-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.28.2.108-122

Umara, N. S. (2017). Pemisahan Pertanggungjawaban Perampasan Barang Dalam Penguasaan Pihak Ketiga Yang Beritikad Baik Dalam Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 8(2), 232-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v8i2.a7027