Legal Protection in Consumer Dispute Resolution: Independence of the Financial Services Authority (OJK)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i2.87Keywords:
Alternative, Dispute Resolution, Financial Services Authority (OJK), Legal ProtectionAbstract
The progress of the national economy is influenced by financial services. The Financial Services Authority (OJK) as an independent institution that is responsible and plays an important role in supervising and regulating management in the financial services sector, is committed to providing legal protection guarantees for consumer rights. The normative legal research method using a statutory approach and this concept approach shows the results that the Financial Services Authority (OJK) has used the concept of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as part of pseudo/quasi by establishing an Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution based on OJK Regulation Number 61/POJK.07/2020 of 2020 concerning Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector as a follow-up step taken to provide legal protection to consumers in the financial services sector in regulating and resolving disputes or complaints. In addition, the independence of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) has guaranteed in protecting consumers in the financial services sector with the issuance of OJK Regulation Number 6/POJK.07/2022 of 2022 concerning Consumer and Public Protection in the Financial Services Sector.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Amilatul, S. N., Suciati, S., & Ambarsari, R. I. D. (2021). Upaya Penanganan Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Terhadap Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 6(1), 61– 67.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v6i1.5658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v6i1.5658
Athasya, A., & Muryanto, Y. T. (2019). Tugas Dan Fungsi Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Sengketa
Perdata Terkait Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen. Jurnal Privat Law, 7(2), 164.
https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v7i2.34403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v7i2.34403
Aufa;, M. F., & Fittriyanti, F. (2022). The Integration of Alternative Dispute Resolutions Institutions
in the Financial Services Sector with POJK No. 61/POJK.07/2020. Veteran Law Review, 5(2).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v5i2.4633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v5i2.4633
Gusdarnelis, D., Iyah Faniyah, & Bisma Putra Pratama. (2024). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam
Penyelesaian Sengketa Penolakan Klaim Asuransi Kerugian oleh Perusahaan Asuransi Terhadap
Nasabahnya. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(4), 1321–1331.
https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i4.445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i4.445
Harjono, D. K., & Panjaitan, H. (2021). Settlement of Consumer Disputes Through the Consumer
Dispute Resolution Agency and Their Problems. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 10(3), 463.
https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.3.2021.463-478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.3.2021.463-478
Ilias, I. a. k. . I., Mohd Zain, M. I., Rahmat, N. E., & Keumala, D. (2023). A Comparative Assessment
of Alternative Dispute Resolution for Financial Consumer Protection in Malaysia and Indonesia.
In Kedah International Conference on Social Science and Humanities (Vol. 8). International
Conference on Contemporary Legal and Policy Issues (ICCLPI).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI13.5041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI13.5041
Imam Asfali. (2023). Kewenangan dan Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan dalam Rangka
Perlindungan Nasabah Perbankan Setelah Dibentuknya Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011
Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 1(2), 313–322.
https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v1i2.272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v1i2.272
Indonesia, O. R. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 61 /POJK.07/2020 Tentang Lembaga
Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan, Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
Republik Indonesia Nomor 61 /Pojk.07/2020 § (2020). Retrieved from
https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/227092/peraturan-ojk-no-61-pojk072020-tahun-2020
Kholid, M. (2016). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN PASCA KELUARNYA
UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG OTORITAS JASA
KEUANGAN. Adliya, 10(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v10i1.5148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v10i1.5148
Kumala, W., Yaswirman, Y., & Ulfanora, U. (2019). Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Asuransi Pasca Keluarnya Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Nomor 1/POJK.07/2014. Jurnal Mercatoria, 12(2), 102.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v12i2.2748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v12i2.2748
Lestari, S. (2023). The Legal Certainty for Resolving Consumer and Business Actor Disputes from the Perspective of Social Engineering Justice from Roscoe Pound. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i3.1309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i3.1309
Maryanto, Hanim, L., & Fitri, D. A. (2021). PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING CONSUMER DISPUTES THROUGH CONSUMER DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AGENCY (BPSK). International Journal of Law Society Service, 1(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/ijlss.v1i2.17822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlss.v1i2.17822
Musjtari, D. N., Yunita, A., & Hamsin, M. K. (2020). Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Melalui Mekanisme Fasilitasi Oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Ojk). Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.1.2020.1-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.1.2020.1-13
OJK Republik Indonesia. PERATURAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 6 /POJK.07/2022 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DAN MASYARAKAT DI SEKTOR JASA KEUANGAN (2022). Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/227355/peraturan-ojk-no-6pojk072022-tahun-2022
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN (2011). Indonesia. Retrieved from= https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39257/uu-no-21-tahun-2011
Pemerintah RI. UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN, Jakarta § (1999). Indonesia: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45288/uu-no-8-tahun-1999
Putri, S. P. (2023). Kompleksitas Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Dinamika Hukum & Masyarakat, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.30737/dhm.v5i2.4651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30737/dhm.v5i2.4651
Rambe, T. A. F., Sunarmi, S., Siregar, M., & Sukarja, D. (2022). Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Kota Medan Memeriksa Sengketa Konsumen Jasa Keuangan Pasca Terbentuknya Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 1(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v1i2.57 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v1i2.57
Sinaga, K. R. (2022). Coordination System Between Financial Services Authorities And Deposit Guarantee Insittutions In Handling Failed Banks Based On Law Number 21 Year 2011 Concerning Financial Services Authorities. Journal of Law Science, 4(1). Retrieved from https://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/JLS/article/view/1691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v4i1.1691
Situmorang, R. L., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Rechtssicherheit Alternative Dispute Resolution in Financial Services (LAPS SJK) as a Forum for External Dispute Resolution in Services of Consumer Complaints through Consumer Protection Portal Application (APPK). Melayunesia Law, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30652/ml.v7i1.7973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30652/ml.v7i1.7973
Supriatna, U. (2019). Kewenangan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Di Bidang Perbankan Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Keuangan Dan Perbankan (JIKA), 7(2), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.34010/jika.v7i2.1911 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34010/jika.v7i2.1911
Syam, M., Zahara, Z., Fitri, D., & Oktarina, N. (2023). Sengketa Leasing Dalam Konteks Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i1.324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i1.324
Ulfia Hasanah. (2014). Efektifitas Pengawasan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) berdasarkan Undang- Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis, 5(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jab.5.1.85-99
Wibowo, D. E. (2019). Penerapan Konsep Utilitarianisme Untuk Mewujudkan Perlindungan Konsumen Yang Berkeadilan Kajian Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor: 1/Pojk.07/2013 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 19(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.18592/sy.v19i1.2296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18592/sy.v19i1.2296
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Riad Abdillah, Sjaifurrachman Sjaifurrachman, Abintoro Prakoso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.