Fair Law in Money Laundering with the Origin of Corruption with the Concept of Asset Seizure

Ariman Sitompul; Aisyah Aisyah

doi:10.59712/iaml.v3i3.101

Authors

Ariman Sitompul Magister Hukum Universitas Dharmawangsa, Medan, Indonesia
Aisyah Aisyah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Prima Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i3.101

Keywords:

Asset Seizure, Corruption, Justice

Abstract

Money laundering is a guarantee to get the results of criminal acts establish the economic responsibilities of a country and especially of tact currency exchange rates will be more difficult. Glassy from this, the achievement of assets becomes important because the method of approach used to be known as "following the money". The concept of Internal Revenue money from the perspective of Justice. This study is the norm or research doctrinaire, also referred to as dogmatic research with a conceptual approach and legislation. The study found that the achievement of assets in laundering money has actually been seized in Indonesia in the form of criminal forfeiture based on Criminal Code and code of Criminal Procedure, civil forfeiture and administrative forfeiture under the PPTPPU law, but in setting and implementation there is still a law that can used by criminals to return the proceeds of their crimes, so as not to get a sense of Justice, harming the state and society completely money kidnapping victim. Based on the perspective of Justice derived from the fundamental principle of Justice states that justice should not be contested the culprit. This underlies the need for consideration of regulatory responsibility foreclosure of assets, especially related to civil / in foreclosure rem by reformulating unity in the UU PPTPPU. In addition, liability claims can also be made through legislation that specifically addresses the achievement of assets with a train of thought that is not just limited to the assets in the account user creation service providers only, but includes all assets associated with evil. Maintaining health against certain infectious diseases is also good it needs to be organized to increase the sense of justice for society and the state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ariman Sitompul, Arie Kartika , Windy Sri Wahyuni, M. (2022). Money Laundering Crime In The Perspective Of Islamic Law In The System Of Proof. Justicia Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial, 19(2), 282. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v19i2.3920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v19i2.3744

Ariman Sitompul, E. S. H. (2023). Establishment of The Law On The Seizure of Assets Resulting From Money Laundering Based On Fair Law Enforcement In Indonesia. SASI, 29(3),596–604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1504

Ariman Sitompul, P Hasibuan, M Sahnan. (2021). The Morality Of Law Enforcement Agencies (Police, Prosecutor's Office, KPK) In Money Laundering With The Origin Of The Corruption. European Science Review 9 (10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29013/ESR-21-9.10-55-63

Ariman Sitompul. (2023). Alternative Dispute Resolution Criminal Acts Of Money Politics In Elections In View Of Normative Law. International Asia Of Law And Money Laundering (Iaml), 2(1), 1–9. Https://Doi.Org/10.59712/Iaml.V2i1.52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v2i1.52

Ariman Sitompul. (2023). Eradication Of Corruption By Tracing Money Laundering As An Integral Legal System That Can Not Be Separated. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 2(3), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v2i3.66 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v2i3.66

Ariman Sitompul. (2024). Gratification development in corruption in Indonesia. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 3(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i1.77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i1.77

Ariman Sitompul. 2023, Transfer Of Billing Rights To Third Parties In The Banking System. International Asia Of Law and Money Legalpreneur Journal Vol. 2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v1i2.3134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v1i2.3134

Besdy Besdy, Pony Pony, Abraham Abraham, Ariman Sitompul, 2024, Comparison of Transfer Pricing methods and their application in disputed tax cases in Indonesian courts, Legal Preneur Journal,Vol. 2. No.2 p. 197-2005. https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v2i2.4402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v2i2.4402

Camelia Irwan, Hasudungan Sinaga, & Eni Jaya. (2024). Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Terhadap Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi: (Studi Putusan Nomor: 24/Pid.Sus.Tpk/2020/PN.Makassar). Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(12), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i12.2681

Denniagi, E. 2021. Analisis Ke-Ekonomian Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 6(2), 246– 264. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss2.art3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss2.art3

Direktorat Hukum Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan, 2021. Kajian Hukum: Permasalahan Hukum Seputar Perampasan Aset dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dan Upaya Pengoptimalisasiannya. Jakarta: Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK).

Guntari, S., Kusbianto, K., Zuliah, A., & Sitompul, A. (2024). Legal Regulations for Children Involved in Narcotics Crimes in Indonesia. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 3(3), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v3i3.1301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v3i3.1301

Hasibuan, E. S. (2023). Analysis of the use of discretionary rights by members of the national police under law No. 2 of 2002 and the use of discretion in error. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(1), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i1.125

http://library.stik-ptik.ac.id/detail?id=54304&lokasi=lokal

Irawan, Bayu Agung et al. Analisis Manajemen Resiko Korupsi dalam Penyelundupan Senjata dan Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Anti Korupsi, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 67-81, feb. 2024. ISSN 2986-0741. Available at: <https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JAK/article/view/38818>. Date accessed: 01 june 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.19184/jak.v4i1.38818.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia VI Daring, 2023. Aset. Dikutip dari https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/Aset

Kurniawan, R. A. (2013). Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Narkotika sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Jurnal Judiciary, 4(1), 64–86.

Lubis, F. 2018, Kewajiban Profesi Sebagai Pihak Pelapor Atas Transaksi Keuangan Yang Mencurigakan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Vol. 10 (2): 210-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v10i2.11438

Miftahuddin. (2019). Perbandingan Konsep Keuangan pada Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS). 2 (2): 213-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v2i2.86

Miladmahesi, R. (2020). Dinamika Baru dalam Pemulihan Aset Akibat Korupsi di Indonesia. Journal of Judicial Review, 22(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v22i1.720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v22i1.720

Nasichin, M., & Nofita, N. P. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Pro Hukum?: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik, 10(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.55129/jph.v10i1.1434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55129/jph.v10i1.1434

Nugraha, S. P. (2020). Kebijakan Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Proceeding National Conference For Law Studies: Pembangunan Hukum Menuju Era Digital Society, 2(1), 978–979.

Pagar, M Syahnan, A Sitompul, 2020. International Journal Of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) 8 (1) http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/15945/1/THE%20CRIMINAL%20REPLACEMENT.pdf

Pakpahan, R. H., Pakpahan, R. H., & Firdaus, A. (2019). Pembaharuan kebijakan hukum Asset Recovery: Antara Ius Constitutum dan Ius Constituendum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(3), 369–378.

Putri, C. A. (2023). Mahfud MD: Pencucian Uang Lebih Bahaya dari Korupsi! Dikutip dari CNBC Indonesia website: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20230320155644-4-423265/mahfud-md- pencucian-uang-lebih-bahaya-dari-korupsi

Putri, N. S., & Tajudin, I. (2014). Kewenangan KPK untuk Melakukan Penyitaan terhadap Barang Bukti yang Diduga Hasil Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang yang Tindak Pidana Asalnya Bukan Berasal dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Padjadjaran Law Review, 2, 1–30.

Ramadhan, F., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Pasal 3 Undang – Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 : (Studi Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dari Hasil Tindak Pidana Narkotika pada Putusan Perkara Nomor 438/Pid.Sus/2014/PN Stb). ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 3(3), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.56799/jim.v3i3.2962

Ramdan, A. (2017). Pengaruh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 77/PUU-XII/2014 terhadap Pemberantasan Money Laundering Perbandingan Indonesia dengan Tiga Negara Lain. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 17(4), 335. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2017.v17.335-349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2017.V17.335-349

Siburian, R. J., & Wijaya, D. (2022). Korupsi dan Birokrasi: Non-Conviction based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan yang Lebih Berdayaguna. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v3i1.12233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v3i1.12233

Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji. (2019). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (Edisi 1, C). Rajawali Pers.

SUHAEMIN, Amin; MUSLIH, Muslih; FIRMANSYAH, Moch. Fahmi. Predicate Offence Dan Derifative Crime Sebagai Suatu Splitsing Case Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Dilakukan Oleh Korporasi. Edulaw : Journal of Islamic Law and Jurisprudance, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-11, feb. 2024. Available at: <https://journal.bungabangsacirebon.ac.id/index.php/edulaw/article/view/2033>.

Wibowo, W. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Pihak Ketiga Yang Beritikad Baik Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurist-Diction, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v2i5.15248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v2i5.15248