Mediation in the Settlement of Inheritance and Joint Property Matters in the Medan Religious Court

Authors

  • Ariman Sitompul undhar
  • Sabela Gayo
  • Dina Mary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i2.85

Keywords:

Mediation, Agreement, Peace, Common Property

Abstract

Conflict or dispute always exists in every human relationship in social interaction, common property is a thing that often triggers conflict in the family is known that not a few cases of conflict which resulted from the inheritance that goes to court. Disputes generally occur regarding rights and obligations that are classified in civil conflict issues can be resolved one of them by mediation both out of court and in court. Mediation in the settlement of civil cases can conducted at the beginning of litigation as well as during litigation against inheritance claims, joint property claims. Solution dispute specifically has the meaning that the dispute between husband and wife differences of opinion between the two parties due to property can also refer to disputes so that over this there is an imbalance ownership and need a good mediation process to equalize the position for both parties. This study aims to explain the legal power of mediation in court proceedings Religion Medan, the second to know the procedures for the division of inheritance and joint property according to compilation of Islamic law. Type of research used is empirical legal research with approach juridical sociological. The Data used is sourced from primary and secondary legal data analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that the legal power of mediation in the trial process in the Religious Court of Medan, namely with the deed of peace, the result of the peace agreement received legal certainty, the second division of common property according to the compilation of the law Islam is a husband or wife gets the same half because it is also seen based on taste fairness or good faith of one of the parties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anindya Harimurti, D. (2021). Perbandingan Pembagian Harta Bersama Menurut Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, 3(02), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v3i02.8908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v3i02.8908

Wawancara Mediator PA Medan Dina Mary: Mediasi Pembagian Harta Bersama Pada Saat Proses Perceraian, (2024).

Duha, J. (2024). Islamic criminal law : A Comparison Of its Application in Indonesia and Other Countries. 1–12.

Gayo, S. (2022a). Resolving Environmental Dispute With Mediation Method. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 1(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v1i1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v1i1.5

Gayo, S. (2022b). The Use of Mediation As an Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Resolution of Intellectual Property Rights Disputes. Syntax Literate, 1(2), 5373. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v1i2.18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v1i2.18

Gayo, S. (2023a). The Use Of Mediation In Maritime And Fisheries Dispute Resolution. Legalpreneur Journal, 2(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v2i1.3718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v2i1.3718

Gayo, S. (2023b). The Use of Mediation in the Settlement of Procurement Disputes. 3414(1), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i1.76

I Kadek Leo Byasama Wijaya, Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2021). Penyelesaian Perkara Harta Warisan dan Harta Bersama dengan Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Badung (Nomor Perkara 0095/PDTG/2017/PABDG). Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(1), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.1.2800.88-92 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.1.2800.88-92

Kucukali, C., Bukalerova, L. A., Naurzaliyeva, S. M., & Vasilenko, A. S. (2022). Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution in Intellectual Property Disputes in Turkey and Russian Federation. Geo-Economy of the Future: Sustainable Agriculture and Alternative Energy: Volume II., 2(2), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92303-7_62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92303-7_62

Maswandi, M., Jamillah, J., & Sitompul, A. (2022). The Power of Proof In Victims of Sexsual Abuse. Sasi, 28(3), 390. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i3.988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i3.988

Muhammad Zulhidayat. (2022). JUDGES ’ INTERPRETATION REGARDING THE DIVISION OF COLLECTIVE ( SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCY STUDY NUMBER. 1(1), 81–85.

Wawancara PA Medan: Pembagian Waris Dalam islam, (2023).

Nagara, B. (2016). Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini Atau Harta Bersama Setelah Perceraian Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. Lex Crimen, 5(7), 51–57.

Risky, B. (2020). Konsep Pembagian Harta Bersama Menurut Hukum Islam Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Lentera: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies, 2(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.32505/lentera.v2i1.2115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32505/lentera.v2i1.2115

Sugiswati, B. (2014). Konsepsi Harta Bersama Dari Perspektif Hukum Islam, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Dan Hukum Adat. Perspektif, 19(3), 201. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v19i3.22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v19i3.22

Suprianto, A. (2022). Mediasi Pembagian Harta Bersama dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Sleman Nomor 413/Pdt.G/2015/PA. Smn. Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan, 1(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.47200/awtjhpsa.v1i2.1291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47200/awtjhpsa.v1i2.1291

Utami, S. M. P., & Dalimunthe, S. N. I. S. (2023). Penerapan Teori Keadilan Terhadap Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 6(1), 433. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6899

Zubaidi, Z. (2020). Tanggapan Ulama Dayah Terhadap Pembagian Harta Bersama Menurut Pasal 97 KHI. Media Syari’ah, 22(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v22i1.6615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v22i1.6615

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Sitompul, A., Gayo, S., & Mary, D. (2024). Mediation in the Settlement of Inheritance and Joint Property Matters in the Medan Religious Court. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 3(2), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i2.85

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>