Bankruptcy Verdict as a Legal Result of the Rejection of the Peace Plan Proposal by Creditors in the Process of Postponing Debt Repayment Obligations (PKPU)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i4.111Keywords:
Bankruptcy, Peace Plan Proposals, Postponement of Debt Repayment, ObligationsAbstract
The process of postponing the debt payment obligation (PKPU) lasts for 270 (two hundred and seventy) days starting from the reading of the PKPU decision. Within 270 days the debtor must prepare a peace plan in the form of a peace proposal that will be offered to the creditors to repay its debts. The peace plan or often referred to as the peace Proposal plan is not clearly regulated and detailed in Law Number 37 of 2007 on bankruptcy and delay and debt repayment obligations. The peace plan is one of the debtor's efforts to make payments on debts that have been registered by creditors, verified and recognized by the debtor which is then authorized by the supervisory judge through the establishment of a fixed Bill list. The peace plan will not necessarily be accepted by the creditors but there will be discussion and voting that will determine whether or not the peace plan offered by the debtor is accepted as a determinant of whether PKPU will end with a bankruptcy decision will be handed down or homologation decision. The method of research conducted in this writing is to use the normative method. This study was conducted by searching and understanding the literature or the bankruptcy law and debt repayment obligation postponement (PKPU) with literature research. This study will examine how the process of postponement of debt repayment obligations (PKPU) until the bankruptcy verdict is handed down to the debtor based on the study of the Commercial Court decision at the Semarang District Court Number : 9/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2024 / PN.Commerce.Smg). Thus, it can be seen how the process of discussing the peace plan proposal in the process of postponing debt payment obligations (PKPU) will determine whether the bankruptcy decision will be imposed on the debtor or the Peace decision (homologation).
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ali, T. H. S. B. (2018). Efektifitas Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Dalam Rangka Mencegah Kepailitan (Studi Kasus PKPU PT Asmin Koalindo Tuhup di Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat). Law Review, 17(3), 205-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19166/lr.v17i3.788
Angelique, P. D., Sufiarina, S., & Ginting, E. (2024). PENYELESAIAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG DAN AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP PT. BANGUN INVESTA GRAHA (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 32/Pdt/Sus-PKPU/2019/PN Niaga Jkt. Pst). Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(11), 59-69.
Ediwarman,2016, Monograf Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Panduan Penulisan Skripsi, Disertasi, dan Disertasi, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.
Emmmy Yuhasssarie et al., Cetakan ke-2, Pusat Pengkajian Hukum, Jakarta.
Fred Tumbuan dikutip dari, Rudy A. Lontoh, 2007, Pokok-Pokok Undang_undang Kepailitan Sebagaimana Diubah Oleh Perpu No. 1/1998, Pustaka Surya, Bandung.
Izulkha, A. T. (2025). Kepastian Hukum dan Hak Kreditor Konkuren Dalam Pembatalan Perjanjian Perdamaian pada Kasus PKPU (Studi Putusan: Nomor 15/Pdt. Sus-Pembatalan Perdamaian/2022/PN. Niaga/Jkt. Pst). Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(2), 880-888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i2.1314
Joni,2008, Hukum Kepailitan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Kenting, Y. A., & Parulian, H. D. (2022). Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Terhadap Rencana Perdamaian Dalam Proses Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: ALETHEA, 5(2), 91-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/alethea.vol5.no2.p91-110
Loebby Loqman, 2004,Aspek Pidana dalamHukum Kepailitan, dalam Prosiding; Rangkaian Lokakarya Terbatas Masalah-Masalah Kepailitan dan Wawasam Hukum Bisnis Lainnya-Kepailitan dan Transfer Aset Secara Melawan Hukum
M.Hadi Shubhan, 2008, Hukum Kepailitan;Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan, Kencana Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.
Poesoko, Herowati, Hadi Shubhan, Ivida Amrih Suci, 2024, Hukum Kepailitan (Karakteristik Hukum Kepailitan dalam penegakan hukum, Hakekat Kepailitan, Subjectum Litis & Objectum Litis, Pengembanan Teoritis & Pengembanan Praktis dan Gugatan Lain-lain), Cetakan II, LaksBang Justitia Yogyakarta.
Rahayu Hartini,2008. Hukum Kepailitan Edisi Revisi Berdasarkan Undang-undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, UPT Percetakan Universitas Muhamadiyah ,Malang.
Sentosa Sembiring,2006, Hukum Kepailitan dan Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang Terkait dengan Kepailitan, CV. Nuansa Aulia, Bandung.
Serlika Aprita,2017, Wewenang Dan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Kurator, CV. Pena Indis, Makasar.
Shaumy, J., Rhoudotul, G., Astuti, I. R., Latisha, N., & Nugroho, A. A. (2023). PENGATURAN HUKUM KEPAILITAN DALAM MENYELESAIKAN KASUS TERKAIT PENGURUSAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) DI INDONESIA. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 1(3), 91-100.
Sheila Posita,2010, Actio Pauliana Untuk Melindungi Budel Pailit Dari Perbuatan Debitor Yang Dapat Merugikan Kreditor, Universitas Islam Indonesia Fakultas Hukum,Yogyakarta.
Sianipar, M. R. B., Sahputra, R., & Sitompul, A. (2024). Obstacles Faced by The Curator, As Well As The Efforts Made by The Curator In Conducting Actio Pauliana Against Bankruptcy Assets. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 3(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v3i4.1418
Sitompul, A. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Strategi Praktis Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi).
Sitompul, A. (2023). Eradication Of Corruption By Tracing Money Laundering As An Integral Legal System That Can Not Be Separated. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 2(3), 111-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v2i3.66
Sitompul, A. (2023). Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Serta Penanggulangan Kejahatan di Indonesia.
Sitompul, A. (2023). The use of forensic physician expertise in view of health law against murder cases. SASI, 29(1), 112-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i1.1281
Sitompul, A. (2023). Transfer Of Billing Rights To Third Parties In The Banking System. Legalpreneur Journal, 1(2), 71-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v1i2.3134
Sitompul, M. N., & Sitompul, A. (2022). Execution Of Death Penalty In Narcotics Crime In The Perspective Of National Law In Indonesia. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 1(2), 107-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v1i2.19
Tandra Soedeson. 2020. hukum kepailitan kertas kerja kurator & pengurus, Laksbang Pustaka ,Yogyakarta:.
Tjitrosoedibio, 1981, Kamus Hukum, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta
Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dedek Mulyanta Sembiring, Ariman Sitompul, Rilawadi Sahputra, Syariful Azmi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
