Analysis Of Narcotics Crime Group I Is Not A Plant In Decision No. 252/PID.SUS / 2025 / PN TBT

Maswandi Maswandi

doi:10.59712/iaml.v5i1.155

Authors

Maswandi Maswandi Universitas Medan Area

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v5i1.155

Keywords:

Consideration of Judges, Rehabilitation, Methamphetamine, Narcotics Possession, Narcotics

Abstract

The abuse of class I non-crop narcotics in Indonesia has reached alarming levels and requires comprehensive legal treatment. This study analyzed the Tebingtinggi District Court decision number 252 / Pid.Sus/2025/PN Tbt to understand the application of criminal law in the case of possession of methamphetamine weighing 1.18 grams. Normative juridical research methods are used by examining positive legal norms and their application through literature studies of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the panel of judges managed to prove the elements of Article 112 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009 systematically, where the defendant was proven to possess narcotics without legitimate rights. Juridical considerations reflect the application of the principle of legality by distinguishing acts of circulation and ownership, so that subsidiary charges are more appropriately applied. The verdict of five years imprisonment and a fine of one hundred million rupiah shows the proportionality between the weight of the act and the sanctions imposed. The study concluded that the verdict has met the principles of legal certainty and substantive justice, but the rehabilitative approach needs to be optimized to distinguish traffickers and users in order to realize a justice system that is not only repressive but also restorative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Amalia, H. P., Pasa, N. A., Nur, S., & D, S. (2024). Problematika Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika di Indonesia. Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum, 5(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v5i3.367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v5i3.367

Ariman Sitompul (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Strategi Praktis Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi).

Ariman Sitompul, & Sitompul, M. N. (2020). The Combination Of Money Laundering Crime With The Origin Of Narkotics Crime To Islamic Law. In Proceeding International Seminar of Islamic Studies (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 671-681).

Ariman Sitompul, . (2020). Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dengan Asal Pidana Korupsi (Kajian Perspektif Hukum Islam). Malang: Mazda Media.

Ariman Sitompul, ., & Hasibuan, P. (2021). The morality of law enforcement agencies (Police, Prosecutor’s Office, KPK) in money laundering with the origin of the corruption. European Science Review, (9-10), 55-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29013/ESR-21-9.10-55-63

Ariman Sitompul, 2023, Alternative Dispute Resolution Criminal Acts Of Money Politics In Elections In View Of Normative Law, International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering . Vol. 2, No. 1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v2i1.52

Ariman Sitompul, Sabela Gayo (2023) Mediasi Perkara Pidana di Indonesia, Mazda Media, Malang, 1-190 https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=o6ripa8AAAAJ&cstart=20&pagesize=80&citation_for_view=o6ripa8AAAAJ:M3NEmzRMIkIC

Ariman Sitompul. (2020). The Criminal Replacement Of Fine In Law Of Money Laundering Number 8 Of 2010 (Case Study In North Sumatera). International Journal Of Creative Research Thoughts, 8(11).

Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2025). Putusan Nomor 252/Pid.Sus/2025/PN.

Fransiska, A., Iryawan, A. R., Qisthi, A., Ginting, M. S., Yulianto, T., Misero, Y., & Ramadhan, C. R. (2020). Anomali Kebijakan Narkotika. Penerbit Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=hbPpDwAAQBAJ

Hasan, Z., Rusdiyanto, D., Siwi, D. R., Siratama, A. V., & Renaldy, D. (2024). Penyalahgunaan Narkoba Pada Remaja. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 4245–4258. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/7852

Iskandar, A. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Narkotika (Rehabilitatif Terhadap Penyalah Guna Dan Pecandu, Represif Terhadap Pengedar). Elex Media Komputindo. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=nxiUDwAAQBAJ

Kinzi, F. S. Al, & Megawati, W. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perantara Penjualan Narkotika Golongan I Non-Tanaman di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang. Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, 5(3), 689–697. https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v5i3.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v5i3.3455

Kusuma, A., Kamil, M., & Aditya, T. (2022). Tindak Pidana Tanpa Hak Dan Melawan Hukum Memiliki Dan Menyimpan Narkotika Golongan 1 Bukan Tanaman. Jurnal Pemandhu, 3(3), 231–236. https://ejournal.unis.ac.id/index.php/JM/article/view/3122

M Sadam Husin, S. H. M. H., Dr. Maria Maya Lestari, S. H. M. S. M. H., & Dr. Davit Rahmadan, S. H. M. H. (2025). Restorative Justice Terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika:: Perbandingan Hukum Dalam Konsep Pendekatan. PUSTAKA AKSARA. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ZJKt0QEACAAJ

Maswandi, A. S. (2024). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Mekanisme Dalam Penulisan Ilmiah), Mazda Media, Malang.

Royhan, J. (2023). Hukum Dan Moralitas: Dimensi Filosofis Dalam Penegakan Hukum. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11111/praxis.xxxxxx

Sitompul, A. (2023). Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Serta Penanggulangan Kejahatan di Indonesia.

Sitompul, A., Gayo, S., & Mary, D. (2024). Mediation in the Settlement of Inheritance and Joint Property Matters in the Medan Religious Court. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 3(2), 34-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i2.85

Suteki, G. T., & Taufani, G. (2023). Metodologi penelitian hukum (filsafat, teori dan praktik). Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Syahruddin. (2025). Legal Analysis of Criminal Conspiracy in Class I Narcotics Crimes Not Plants and the Imposition of Criminal Sentences by Judges Study of Decision Number 23 / Pid . Sus / 2025 / PN Ban. Ratio Legis Journal (RLJ), 4(4), 4364–4373. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.240

Telaumbanua, Y. G. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Golongan I Bukan Tanaman. Jurnal Panah Hukum, 4(2), 1–12. https://jurnal.uniraya.ac.id/index.php/JPHUKUM DOI: https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v4i2.1559

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2009). Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. 255. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/details/38776/uu-no-35-tahun-2009

Wara, C. C., Pello, J., & Manuain, O. G. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Hakim Tentang Tindak Pidana Menggunakan, Menguasai, Dan Menyediakan Narkotika Golongan I Bukan Jenis Tanaman (Studi Kasus Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kupang Nomor 193/Pid.Sus/2022/PN KPG). Petitum LawJournal, 1(2), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.35508/pelana.v1i2.14772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35508/pelana.v1i2.14772

Wijaya, A., & Ruslie, A. (2024). Kendala dan Permasalahan dalam Rehabilitasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Journal Evidence Of Law, 3(3), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v3i3.690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v3i3.690