Legal Analysis of Embezzlement in Office in Committing Corruption in Decision No. 2182 K / Pid.Sus/2019

Gatot Efrianto; Sabela Gayo

doi:10.59712/iaml.v5i1.160

Authors

Gatot Efrianto Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Sabela Gayo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v5i1.160

Keywords:

Corruption, Criminal Liability, Embezzlement in Office

Abstract

Embezzlement in office is a corruption modus operandi that threatens the country's financial stability through abuse of authority by state officials. Objective: This study analyzes the legal construction of embezzlement in office as a crime of corruption as well as the consideration of judges in the Supreme Court Decision No. 2182 K/Pid.Sus/2019. Method: normative juridical approach is used by reviewing legislation and court decisions through literature studies, as well as descriptive qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. Result: the verdict proved that the defendant's actions meet the elements of embezzlement in office and corruption in the presence of substantial state financial losses due to abuse of authority. The judge takes into account the aspect of causality between office and state losses, as well as applies proportionate sanctions taking into account aggravating and mitigating factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Kaparang, Xaverly Claudio E. D. “Sanksi Hukum Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan Menurut Pasal 8 Undang- Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi” IX, no. 13 (2021).

Lakuteru, Venti Arista. “Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Pemalsuan Tanda Tangan Korupsi” 2, no. 1 (2025): 25–32.

Lawrence, Perspektif Teori. “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dari” 2, no. 2 (2025): 153–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v2i2.1819

Maswandi, A. S. (2024). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Mekanisme Dalam Penulisan Ilmiah), Mazda Media, Malang.

Manusiwa, Ronny William. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan Bedasarkan Putusan Nomor 260/Pid.B/2023/Pn Spt” 5, no. 02 (2025): 35–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v5i02.1769

Mulya, Oksavera Sinta. “Efektivitas Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Penggelapan Jabatan Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” 2022, 113–21. https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v3i2.1150.3.

Prajasa, Syakira Mala. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penggelepan Dalam Jabatan (Studi Putusan Nomor 351/Pid.B/2023/PN.Mlg),” no. 62 (2025): 16–30.

“PUTUSAN Nomor 2182 K/Pid.Sus/2019,” 2019.

Renggong, Ruslan, and Basri Oner. “Tindakan Penyelidikan Kepolisian Terhadap Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Terkait Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi” 6, no. 1 (2023): 142–48. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v6i1.3834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v6i1.3834

Rianda, Husin. “Aspek Hukum Tindak Pidana Kasus Penggelapan Dana Bantuan Sosial,” 2021, 315–28.

Riskiawan, Putra. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Di Tempat Kerja Berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 96/Pid.B/2024/Pn Pbl” 6 (2025): 1674–88.

Sani, Katarina. “Criminal Law Liability For Perpetrators Of Embezzlement In Office For The Aggrieved Party” 10, no. 2 (2025): 32–46.

Saputra, Muhammad Rendi Ismail. “Analisis Penegakan Hukum Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Hukum Pidana” 2, no. 3 (2024): 25–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58707/aldalil.v2i3.878

Sindarto, Sebastian. “Kebijakan Penyelamatan Keuangan Negara Dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Progresif Handling Corruption Based on a Progressive Legal Perspective Pendahuluan Korupsi Tentunya Tidak Asing Lagi Bagi Sebagian Besar Orang . Berdasarkan” XXV, no. 2 (2021): 182–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v25i2.321

Sitorus, N. T., & Sitompul, A. (2025). Maswandi Criminal Liability For Corruption By Public Officials: Analysis Of Decision No. 141/Pid. Sus-TPK/2024/PN Mdn: Criminal Liability For Corruption By Public Officials: Analysis Of Decision No. 141/Pid. Sus-TPK/2024/PN Mdn. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 24(1), 4416-4423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6484

Sitompul, A., & Sipayung, I. M. (2025). The Development of the Death Penalty for Corruption Committed by Judges in Indonesia. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 17(02), 95-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.172.95.109

Sitompul, A., Sitompul, R. M., & Sitompul, M. N. (2024). Gratification development in corruption in Indonesia. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 3 (1), 17–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i1.77

Sitompul, A. (2023). Eradication Of Corruption By Tracing Money Laundering As An Integral Legal System That Can Not Be Separated. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 2(3), 111-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v2i3.66

Sitompul, M. N., & Sitompul, A. (2023). Application of money laundering in corruption cases in maintaining state stability. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(1), 94-102.

Sitompul, A. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Strategi Praktis Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi).

“Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” 1999.

Yanto, Yanto. “Analyzing Embezzlement in Office in Indonesian Law: Legal Responsibility, Moral Implications, and Recommendations for Reform” 8, no. 2 (2016): 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v40i2.38905