Critical Note The Authority Of TUN To The Cluster Of Government Administration Of Omnibus Law “Cipta Kerja” In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v1i2.16Keywords:
Authority, TUN, Administration of GovernmentAbstract
In the concept of a state of law, everything must be done according to law, so that the government must submit to the law, not the law that must submit to the government, especially to the Mahakamh decision of the Constitution number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 regarding the formal Uuck test that has broad consequences for the interests of the community, especially in testing the authority of TUN, such as the discretionary requirement that eliminates the “provisions in the legislation”, and changes in Article 53 of the Government Administration Law that releases the authority of TUN in testing the government's silence. The formulation of the problem in this paper is intended to provide a critical note and / or input for the improvement of the substance of UUCK to kewenagan Tun, especially in the cluster of Government Administration in Article 175 UUCK (changes to Law No. 30 year 2014 on Government Administration (ADPEM law)). Provisions that should be maintained or should be abolished. The research method used is normative jurisi research method. Normative research requires the approach of legislation (statute Approach) and conceptual approach. Data collection techniques used are through the study of documents and literature on secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The analysis used is descriptive. The conclusion in this paper is found that, first: Uuck's legal politics can be read as the spirit of the state in synchronizing, harmonizing, and eliminating sectoral egos; second: Uuck's provisions that must be maintained are Article 24 of the ADPEM law; third: the amendment to Article 53 of the ADPEM law on the “release “of the Administrative Court's authority in” testing " a government silence to be considered a positive fictitious decision is not necessary, because the Administrative Court's authority to test the government silence that is considered granted is important and vital
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alatas, Syed Husein, Sosologi Korupsi: Sebuah Penjelajahan Data Kontemporer. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1983
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Cetakan Ke-11. Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada. 2019
Austin, John dalam Wilfrid E. Rumble. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007
Batalli, Mirlinda. “Consequences of Administrative Silence in Public Administration”, SEER: Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe 20, no. 1 (2017),(145) DOI: 10.5771/1435-2869-2017-1-139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/1435-2869-2017-1-139
Bentham, Jeremy. Teori Perundang-undangan, Prinsip-prinsip Legislasi, Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Pertama. Bandung: Nuansa dan Nusamedia, 2010
Budiarjo, Mariam. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. 2001
Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law, Edisi Revisi. New Haven: Yale University Press.1969
Garner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictinary. Ninth Edition. Texas: West Group, 2009.
Hadjon, Philipus M. et. al., Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Cetakan Kesebelas. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. 2011
Harlow , C. dan R. Rawlings. Law and Administration, 3rd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1997
imanjuntak, Enrico. “Perkara Fiktif Positif Dan Permasalahan Hukumnya (Fictious Proceedings And Its Legal Problem)”, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 6, no. 3, (2017), (380. 10.25216/jhp.11.1.2022.64-92 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.379-398
Indroharto, Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Buku II), Cetakan Keempat. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan. 1993
Kelsen, Hans. Pengantar Teori Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 201
Koesoemahatmadja, Djenal Hoesen. Pokok-pokok Hukum Tata Usaha Negara. Bandung: Alumni. 1979
Korten, David C. When Corporations Rule the World (Bila Korporasi Menguasai Dunia), Jakarta: Professional Books. 1997
Marbun, S. F. Hukum Administrasi Negara I. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press. 2012
Muchsan. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1982
Ridwan, Diskresi & Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press. 2014
Rusjana, Muhammad. Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Fiktif Positif Melalui Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Master Thesis, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada. 2017
Saputra, M. Nata. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali, 1988
Simanjuntak, Enrico. “Prospek Prinsip Fiktif Positif Dalam Menunjang Kemudahan Berusaha Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding 7, no. 2 (2018) DOI: https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v7i2.250
Sitompul, A, P Hasibuan, M Sahnan. (2021). The Morality Of Law Enforcement Agencies (Police, Prosecutor's Office, KPK) In Money Laundering With The Origin Of The Corruption. European Science Review 9 (10)
Sitompul, A. (2020). The Criminal Replacement Of Fine In Law Of Money Laundering Number 8 Of 2010 (Case Study In North Sumatera). International Journal Of Creative Research Thoughts, 8 (11).
Sitompul,A , & Sitompul, M. N. (2020, February). The Combination Of Money Laundering Crime With The Origin Of Narkotics Crime To Islamic Law. In Proceeding International Seminar of Islamic Studies (Vol. 1, No. 1)
Tobrani, Rahmad. “Pengujian Keputusan Oleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Diskresi yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Pemerintahn”. Jurnal Samudera Keadilan, no 1 (2018), (102) https://ejurnalunsam.id/index.php/jhsk/announcement/view/44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v13i1.694
Wicaksono, Dian Agung, Bimo Fajar Hantoro, dan Dedy Kurniawan, “Quo Vadis Pengaturan Kewenangan Regulasi Dalam Undang-undang Cipta Kerja”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding 10, no. 2 (2021), hlm. 326 https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/ejournal/index.php/jrv/article/view/715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i2.715
Zaki Ulya, Pertanggungjawaban Pejabat Pemerintahan dalam Menetapkan Diskresi (Studi terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016), Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum, No 3, (2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss3.art4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
